Has anyone noticed how vapid, vainglorious, superficial, and shallow Democrats are?
No, this isn’t a trick question.
Ever since fake conservative and New York Times columnist David Brooks said he knew Barack Obama would be a great president simply because of the “crease in his slacks”, Democrats have been on the hunt to find their next Mr. or Ms. Fundamental Transformation.
With the announcement of Robert Francis O’Rourke‘s – excuse me — BETO O’Rourke‘s — presidential announcement last week, Obama worshippers got very excited indeed.
After all, the media’s hyperventilation over O’Rourke (complete with a ludicrous puff piece cover story in Vanity Fair) is very familiar to us Obama watchers.
It was terribly hilarious to watch the media lauding this wildly gesticulating neophyte who seemed to be having a grand mal seizure at every event. Even though many in the media are rabid atheists, they almost unanimously hailed Beto as the second coming of Jesus Christ.
Hyperventilating Robbie screeched about how the earth only has only twelve years left before human beings totally destroy it– and he’s super serious, you guys.
Add him to the chorus of stupid leftists who have taken Democrat rhetoric about the hoax of man-made climate change to a new level. And let him. The more the merrier!
Beto also has zero idea how to solve the exploding crisis of illegal immigration – other than to suggest tearing down the one impediment to it (an existing border wall in El Paso).
And, like any good Democrat, he’s not *totally* come out for socialism — but he says capitalism is “unfair, unjust, and racist” (of course it is).
In fact, he’s no “New Democrat” – he’s the same lunatic variety we’ve girded our loins against for fifty years.
But Beto — as hilariously inept as he seems – is the simply the latest, fevered iteration of Democrats trying to somehow, somewhere find the next Obama.
Remember when Oprah Winfrey gave some blathering speech at the Oscars about uniting instead of dividing, including instead of excluding and other platitudinal drivel? For about three days after the speech, Democrats and media types were clamoring for Oprah to run for president in 2020 — until she finally said, “No, thank you.”
Then they moved on to Michelle Obama. Oh, please run, Michelle! You are our only hope of having the special brand of Obama destruction back in power! People, please. Does anyone actually think Michelle Obama is going to do something that requires working and not simply spending taxpayer money on vacations? As if!
So desperate are Democrats to find the next Obama that they’ll get behind any jackhole who bears any philosophical resemblance to him at all.
And what do Democrats want? They want the most radical person they can find who will implement their insane agenda items (like Obama did) but wrapped in pretty paper so as to be palatable to the American people (like Obama was).
Although superficial, Democrats understand their ideas are still not mainstream enough for the majority of Americans to support. But maybe they’ve changed their thinking.
With Trump Derangement Syndrome in full bloom, it’s clear Democrats are more emboldened than ever.
Who would’ve thought ten years ago Democrats would be promoting 37 gender pronouns? Or the idea that illegal aliens should have more rights than American citizens? Or that sanctuary cities, voting rights, and drivers’ licenses for illegals would be standard operation procedure for Democrats? Or the idea that the hoax of manmade climate change was more of an existential threat to our way of life that radical Islam or illegal immigration? How about the promotion of actual infanticide (a.k.a. “after birth” abortion) ten years ago?
Who would’ve thought ten years ago Democrats would have become so out-of-the-closet radicalized that they openly despise their own country?
The seemingly empty suit (but closet radical) Obama was an invention of Hollywood and leftists. Liberals placed all their dreams in his fluffy brand of hope and change.
With each new Democrat who throws their hats in the presidential ring, Democrats will support or not support based on their resemblance to Obama.
The funniest thing of all is that Beto — excuse me: Robert Francis – is everything that liberals say they hate. He’s a white, rich, heterosexual man! And we all know white, rich, heterosexual men are not welcomed in the modern Democrat party. (Except they totally are – just look at their most prodigious, white-guilted donors.)
So, what’s all this early Beto hype really about? I think it’s very simple. It goes back to their belief that they need an innocuous-looking Trojan Horse of radicalism to sneak in and dupe the average voter.
Although I mock all the Democrats spilling out of the Democrat Clown Car, it’s very possible that one of them could win and become president. Their unvarnished radicalism should alarm every member of Normal America — and we can’t take for granted that at least half the country might embrace their obvious destruction.
So as Democrats continue Looking for Mr. Goodbar – I mean, the next Obama – they’ll take whoever they can get as long as their chosen messiah ruins traditional America as quickly as possible.
Fundamental transformation – here we go again.
